• Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Right Attitudes

Ideas for Impact

Decision-Making

Chances Fade, Regrets Linger

March 29, 2025 By Nagesh Belludi Leave a Comment

Chase Your Dream: Effort Fades, Regret Lasts Forever Chasing a dream demands time, effort, money, and relationships. It requires stepping out of comfort zones, breaking old habits, and confronting setbacks. There’s no guarantee of success—only uncertainty and struggle along the way.

But trying beats regretting. Missed chances haunt more than failed attempts. The weight of “what if” lasts a lifetime. Life changes fast; today’s opportunities may vanish. Take the leap while you can. The pain of effort fades, but the pain of inaction lingers.

Idea for Impact: In the end, the highest price is paid by those who never tried, never lived, and never chased what truly mattered.

Wondering what to read next?

  1. That Burning “What If” Question
  2. Five Ways … You Could Be More Optimistic
  3. ‘Could’ Beats ‘Should’ Every Time
  4. Lessons from the Princeton Seminary Experiment: People in a Rush are Less Likely to Help Others (and Themselves)
  5. Warren Buffett’s Advice on How to Focus on Priorities and Subdue Distractions

Filed Under: Living the Good Life, Sharpening Your Skills Tagged With: Attitudes, Decision-Making, Introspection, Opportunities, Procrastination, Regret, Thought Process

When Work Becomes a Metric, Metrics Risk Becoming the Work: A Case Study of the Stakhanovite Movement

February 10, 2025 By Nagesh Belludi Leave a Comment

Aleksei Stakhanov: The Soviet Miner Who Redefined Productivity Standards

The Struggles of a Low-Performing Mine & The Birth of a Hero

Alexei Grigoriyevich Stakhanov (1906–77) was a miner from Donbass, a coal-rich region in Soviet Ukraine where all mines were state-run with strict monthly production quotas. Failure to meet these targets often resulted in trouble for managers and local Communist Party officials.

Stakhanov worked in one of the region’s lowest-performing mines. Despite having no education beyond primary school, he was determined to improve his community’s productivity. Driven by a deep sense of responsibility, he relentlessly searched for ways to boost output and eventually devised a novel solution.

In the 1930s, miners used picks to extract coal, which was then hauled out by pit ponies. In cramped tunnels, miners would hack away at the coal while propping up the roof with logs. Stakhanov proposed a new system: one miner would focus on continuously picking coal, another would load it onto carts, a third would prop the roof, and a fourth would guide the ponies. He also suggested replacing the traditional pick with a heavy mining drill, requiring specialized training. Despite initial skepticism from the manager, Stakhanov persuaded the team leader and local party official to give it a try.

On the night of August 30, 1935, Stakhanov, along with three colleagues, entered the mine with the party boss and a local reporter. Six hours later, they emerged victorious, having mined 102 tons of coal—more than 14 times the original target.

The feat drew immediate attention. The local newspaper published Stakhanov’s story, and Soviet industry minister Sergo Ordzhonikidze shared it with Joseph Stalin. Soon, Stakhanov’s achievement was celebrated in Pravda, the central party newspaper. After Stalin’s endorsement, the story spread across the Soviet Union, and Stakhanov became a national hero and a symbol of Soviet productivity.

The Obsession with Metrics

Stakhanov’s achievement remains a pivotal moment in Soviet history. It became a shining example of efficiency, elevating him to the status of the ideal worker in the eyes of the Soviet state. His success sparked the Stakhanovite Movement, a state-driven campaign that encouraged workers to exceed their quotas and demonstrate the superiority of socialism.

Stakhanov’s image quickly flooded posters and newspapers, celebrated as a national role model. In December 1935, as America was still grappling with the Great Depression, Time magazine featured Stakhanov on its cover, bringing his story to American shores and solidifying his international fame. After his death, the important industrial city of Kadiivka in the Donbass region was renamed Stakhanov in his honor, a tribute that lasted from 1978 until 2016.

The Stakhanovite Movement: When Metrics Drive Work, Not Outcomes The Stakhanov Movement capitalized on the collective desire for improvement and transformation, leading to increased productivity through better-organized workflows. However, as often happens, when metrics become the sole focus, they overshadow the true purpose of the work. In the Soviet system, the state had to ensure control over production, align workers’ efforts with central economic plans, and maximize output. Quotas played a key role in this strategy, setting mandatory production targets across various industries. Over time, these quotas became the primary measure of success, with workers judged by numbers rather than the quality or long-term impact of their efforts. Those who failed to meet the targets risked being labeled as “wreckers” and accused of sabotaging the system. Stakhanovites were celebrated as heroes, rewarded with media attention, lavish rewards, and even having their names immortalized on factories and streets.

This obsession with metrics led to manipulation, particularly with the “socialist competition” that the Stakhanovite Movement encouraged. Groups and individuals competed to exceed production norms. Workers, fixated on meeting targets, sometimes resorted to shortcuts or ignored safety standards to boost output. As a result, the real goals—sustainable production, worker welfare, and innovation—became secondary pursuits. The metric of raw output became the work itself, distorting its true purpose.

The Obsession with Metrics: A Cautionary Tale

The Stakhanovite Movement highlighted the dangers of an obsession with productivity metrics and how they can distort the true nature of work.

While metrics can serve as useful benchmarks, aligning efforts with goals and driving performance, excessive focus on them can shift the emphasis from the work itself to the measurement process. Each new metric introduces an opportunity cost—resources are drained, and your team’s time is consumed.

When employees become fixated on hitting targets, they often prioritize numbers over innovation and lose sight of the bigger picture. Over-reliance on metrics can distort performance, neglect long-term goals, and stifle creativity.

Complex tasks involve many variables that a single metric cannot capture. Focusing too narrowly on one measure risks oversimplifying the situation, missing critical factors, and turning the work into a mechanical process.

Idea for Impact: Challenge metrics that don’t add value. Discard those that fail to measure real success. Take control of meaningless measurements and strike the right balance between measurable performance and the true purpose of the work.

Wondering what to read next?

  1. Why Incentives Backfire and How to Make Them Work: Summary of Uri Gneezy’s Mixed Signals
  2. Numbers Games: Summary of The Tyranny of Metrics by Jerry Muller
  3. People Do What You Inspect, Not What You Expect
  4. Master the Middle: Where Success Sets Sail
  5. Ethics Lessons From Akira Kurosawa’s ‘High and Low’

Filed Under: Business Stories, Leading Teams, Managing People, Mental Models Tagged With: Biases, Critical Thinking, Decision-Making, Ethics, Goals, Motivation, Performance Management, Persuasion, Psychology, Targets

Situational Blindness, Fatal Consequences

February 1, 2025 By Nagesh Belludi Leave a Comment

How Situational Blindness Caused the American Airlines-Black Hawk Fatal Collision Near Reagan National Airport Earlier this week, I mentioned how accidents rarely result from a single cause, but rather from a series of factors that align to trigger disaster. On their own, these ‘contributing factors’ may seem minor, but together, they can lead to significant incidents, as was the case on Wednesday night.

An American Airlines flight (5342), operated by American Eagle/PSA, collided with an Army Black Hawk helicopter near Reagan National Airport (DCA) in Washington D.C., sending both aircraft into the Potomac River. Tragically, all 60 passengers and 4 crew members aboard the flight, along with the 3 soldiers in the helicopter, lost their lives. Investigations are underway, but while it’s too early for deductions, it appears that a combination of factors contributed to this devastating event.

The Black Hawk was flying under Visual Flight Rules (VFR,) relying heavily on visual references to navigate. This required the pilots to maintain visual separation from other aircraft and use landmarks for guidance. Although typically crewed by four, this Black Hawk had only three personnel aboard. It is unclear whether a single pilot was at the controls, but the absence of a second pilot may have removed a crucial safety layer. In a high-traffic airspace like this, having two pilots flying allows for cross-checking decisions, reducing the risk of errors. Disorientation is a real danger, especially at night with lights reflecting off the river. A second pilot would have provided an additional perspective for decision-making, an extra set of eyes for maintaining visual separation, and crucial support for monitoring instruments and communicating with air traffic control, all of which enhance situational awareness.

The Black Hawk pilot can be heard on the radio confirming visual contact with the incoming aircraft, stating, “PAT 25 [call sign of the Black Hawk] has the traffic in sight, request visual separation.” This indicated that the pilot had assumed responsibility for maintaining a safe distance. The air traffic controller approved the request, effectively transferring collision avoidance duties to the helicopter crew. However, the Black Hawk was supposed to be flying at 200 feet but was instead at an altitude of 350 to 400 feet when the collision occurred—just as Flight 5342 was descending. This altitude discrepancy was a critical error and a key factor in the crash. Notably, just over 24 hours before this fatal incident, another American Eagle jet had to abort its landing after coming dangerously close to a helicopter in the same congested airspace.

There may also have been confusion about which aircraft the Black Hawk needed to avoid. The pilot may have mistakenly identified a different aircraft—either one following Flight 5342 in the landing sequence or another departing from the airport. Although air traffic control communications followed standard procedures, clearer identification of aircraft could have helped prevent the tragedy.

Ultimately, the crash suggests that a series of mistakes—misidentification, altitude discrepancies, and the challenges of navigating busy airspace—may have contributed to the collision. While the Black Hawk was highly maneuverable and could have potentially adjusted its course, these errors seem to have compounded, making avoidance increasingly difficult.

Wondering what to read next?

  1. Accidents Can Happen When You Least Expect Them: The Overconfidence Effect
  2. How Contributing Factors Stack Up and Accidents Unfold: A Case Study of the 2024 Delta A350 & CRJ-900 Collision
  3. Lessons from the World’s Worst Aviation Disaster // Book Summary of ‘The Collision on Tenerife’
  4. What if Something Can’t Be Measured
  5. Be Smart by Not Being Stupid

Filed Under: Effective Communication, Mental Models, Sharpening Your Skills Tagged With: Aviation, Biases, Confidence, Critical Thinking, Decision-Making, Mindfulness, Problem Solving, Thinking Tools, Thought Process

How Contributing Factors Stack Up and Accidents Unfold: A Case Study of the 2024 Delta A350 & CRJ-900 Collision

January 27, 2025 By Nagesh Belludi Leave a Comment

Delta Air Lines A350-900 Strikes CRJ-900 in Atlanta 2024: A Case Study of Contributing Factors and Accident Progression

Accidents rarely result from a single cause but rather from a sequence of situations where various contributing factors align to set disaster in motion. Individually, these factors may seem inconsequential, but when combined, they can escalate into major incidents. Understanding these interconnected aspects can help you transition from reactive responses to proactive accident prevention.

A recent case study involves a ground collision (see visual reconstruction) at Atlanta airport on 10-Sep-2024 between a Delta Air Lines Airbus A350 and a Bombardier CRJ-900 regional jet. While taxiing, the A350’s right wingtip struck the CRJ-900’s vertical stabilizer, resulting in significant damage to the smaller aircraft and minor damage to the A350. The incident remains under investigation, with preliminary findings suggesting that communication gaps, ground movement protocols, and situational awareness issues contributed to the collision.

  • CRJ-900 Positioning. While taxiing for departure, the Endeavor Air/Delta Connection CRJ-900 stopped 56 feet short of the designated hold short line on the taxiway. Although it could have positioned closer in preparation for entering the runway, its position did not violate procedural regulations, which only require that no part of the aircraft extend beyond the hold short line, without specifying a minimum stopping distance. However, had the CRJ-900 taxied closer, the collision with the passing A350 could have been avoided.
  • Delta Air Lines A350-900 Collides with Endeavor Air/Delta Connection CRJ-900 in Atlanta A350 Crew Distraction. While taxiing on an intersecting taxiway, the A350 flight crew detected a maintenance alert on the dashboard. They requested permission to stop on the taxiway to promptly investigate the issue and consult with company maintenance. However, ATC, likely prioritizing traffic flow, denied the request and instructed them to continue past the CRJ-900 before stopping again. Despite this, the crew chose to address the alert while taxiing, leading to a distraction at a critical moment as they passed the other aircraft.
  • Situational Awareness Challenges. Preoccupied with the maintenance alert, the A350 pilots failed to notice the close proximity of the CRJ-900. The cockpit also included two relief crew members—the relief captain and relief first officer—who, like the primary crew, failed to recognize the risk. Positioned on the starboard side, it was the first officer’s responsibility to ensure sufficient clearance. However, distractions impaired their situational awareness and decision-making. Standard protocol dictates that, when in doubt about clearances, pilots should stop, set the brakes, and address issues without multitasking.

As mentioned earlier, the incident is still under investigation, but I believe the ultimate responsibility for avoiding obstacles lies with the distracted A350 crew. Although they followed ATC instructions and stayed on the taxiway’s centerline, the crew should have remained more vigilant. Neither ATC nor the A350 crew noticed that the CRJ-900 was positioned in a way that prevented the A350’s wingtip from clearing it.

Given the limited visibility of the wingtip from the A350 flight deck, it’s pilots should have stopped if they were unsure about clearance. This event highlights the need for improved Crew Resource Management (CRM) training to enhance teamwork, decision-making, and vigilance. Standard procedures emphasize stopping, setting the parking brake, and seeking assistance when obstacles are suspected. Flight crews must maintain spatial awareness and heightened perception of surrounding aircraft, even while managing other operational tasks.

Idea for Impact: Recognizing accidents as the result of interconnected contributing factors emphasizes the importance of addressing not only individual issues but also how they interact within the system.

Wondering what to read next?

  1. Lessons from the World’s Worst Aviation Disaster // Book Summary of ‘The Collision on Tenerife’
  2. “Fly the Aircraft First”
  3. Under Pressure, The Narrowing Cognitive Map: Lessons from the Tragedy of Singapore Airlines Flight 6
  4. Pulling Off the Impossible Under Immense Pressure: Leadership Lessons from Captain Sully
  5. Situational Blindness, Fatal Consequences

Filed Under: Effective Communication, Mental Models, Sharpening Your Skills Tagged With: Aviation, Biases, Conflict, Decision-Making, Mindfulness, Problem Solving, Stress, Thinking Tools

Being Situational

January 21, 2025 By Nagesh Belludi Leave a Comment

Situational Leadership: Effective Leaders Adjust Their Approach When someone asks, “What’s your leadership or managerial style?” the best response often comes down to, “It depends.”

Leadership doesn’t mean sticking to a fixed style—it requires adapting to what the situation demands. While leadership models like authentic, transformational, and servant leadership offer useful insights, taking a situational approach works best. You need to assess the moment and respond with the right style.

Evaluate what the situation calls for. When you need to set firm boundaries, showing frustration sends a clear message. If your team lacks the necessary skills, getting hands-on and micromanaging the tasks drives results. On the other hand, when your team knows what they’re doing, stepping back and offering periodic guidance keeps things on track. Using the same style everywhere rarely delivers the right results.

Idea for Impact: Right style, right time. That’s effective leadership.

Wondering what to read next?

  1. Lessons from Peter Drucker: Quit What You Suck At
  2. Steering the Course: Leadership’s Flight with the Instrument Scan Mental Model
  3. Why Incentives Backfire and How to Make Them Work: Summary of Uri Gneezy’s Mixed Signals
  4. Knowing When to Give Up: Establish ‘Kill Criteria’
  5. The Loss Aversion Mental Model: A Case Study on Why People Think Spirit is a Horrible Airline

Filed Under: Leading Teams, Mental Models, Project Management Tagged With: Biases, Decision-Making, Discipline, Leadership, Management, Mental Models, Mindfulness, Psychology

Starbucks’ Oily Brew: Lessons on Innovation Missing the Mark

January 20, 2025 By Nagesh Belludi Leave a Comment

Starbucks Olive Oil-infused Coffee: Lessons on Innovation Missing the Mark Last quarter, Starbucks pulled the plug on its olive oil-infused Oleato coffee line as part of a broader push to streamline the menu and impro1ve store operational efficiency.

Oleato was among Starbucks’ boldest and riskiest experiments in recent years. It was the brainchild of founder and then-CEO Howard Schultz, an assertive visionary. During a visit to the olive groves of Sicily, Schultz was inspired by the Mediterranean tradition of consuming a daily spoonful of olive oil. He envisioned merging this health practice with Starbucks’ coffee expertise, creating a unique fusion of wellness and indulgence.

Debuting in Italy in February 2023, Oleato expanded globally, offering lattes and cold brews infused with extra virgin olive oil, marketed as luxurious, innovative, and health-conscious. While some customers liked the smooth, velvety texture, many found the flavor odd or the concept hard to swallow. Scaling the product and educating consumers proved challenging, leaving many unsure of its benefits beyond novelty.

Oleato’s flop revealed the risks of niche innovation. Starbucks thrives on pushing boundaries, but not all bold ideas hit the mark. Smart innovation requires knowing when to nurture an idea and when to cut losses. Schultz’s vision of Oleato kept Starbucks daring, but disciplined decision-making is key to ensuring innovation remains a strength, not a liability.

The Oleato dud highlights the perils of leadership driven by unchecked conviction. Schultz’s love affair with Italian espresso bars during a visit to Milan sparked the creation of Starbucks. However, visionary leaders like Schultz often turn bold ideas into untouchable pet projects. Even a passing thought can rapidly evolve into a sweeping directive, leaving little room for dissent. In such environments, feedback is stifled, and ideas can quickly take on a life of their own.

Wondering what to read next?

  1. FedEx’s ZapMail: A Bold Bet on the Future That Changed Too Fast
  2. Your Product May Be Excellent, But Is There A Market For It?
  3. How to … Declutter Your Organizational Ship
  4. Restless Dissatisfaction = Purposeful Innovation
  5. Van Gogh Didn’t Just Copy—He Reinvented

Filed Under: Leading Teams, Mental Models, Project Management, The Great Innovators Tagged With: Creativity, Critical Thinking, Decision-Making, Entrepreneurs, Innovation, Leadership, Leadership Lessons, Parables, Persuasion, Starbucks

Our 10 Most Popular Articles of 2024

December 31, 2024 By Nagesh Belludi Leave a Comment

Top Blog Articles of 2024 Here are our most popular exclusive features of 2024. Pass this on to your friends; if they like these, they can sign up to receive our RSS feeds.

  1. Stop Blaming Your Parents for Your Current Problems. Blaming your parents traps you in the past, preventing growth. Therapy should empower you to focus on what’s within your control today, allowing you to move beyond old wounds and embrace positive change.
  2. Embrace Imperfection to Thrive Like Toyota. Toyota’s culture fosters continuous self-reflection, known as “Hansei,” where mistakes are acknowledged and used to improve. Regular “Hansei-Kai” meetings ensure ongoing progress by analyzing performance and discouraging the pursuit of perfection.
  3. Conquer Paralysis, Not Fear. Fear may hold you back, but paralysis keeps you stuck in place. By acknowledging and embracing fear, you can push past it.
  4. Turn Disagreements into Dialogue Using Neutral Phrasing. Use neutral language, like “it seems,” to separate the person from the problem, reducing defensiveness. This approach encourages understanding, fosters meaningful conversation, and shifts focus from blame to mutual problem-solving.
  5. Discover Why Philosophy Matters for Your Life. Philosophy helps explore deep questions about existence, ethics, and meaning, offering guidance toward more fulfilling pursuits. It encourages the development of virtues and principles, with an emphasis on living a life grounded in purpose rather than mere happiness.
  6. Host a Personal Hackathon: Innovation Isn’t Just for Tech Companies. The hackathon, initially a tech-driven event, sparks creativity and rapid results. Dedicate time to neglected projects, idea brainstorming, or team collaboration—creating a focused, deadline-driven environment that promotes innovation and clears backlogs.
  7. Avoid Undermining Your Success with Smarts Alone. Overvaluing intelligence can limit your success. Neglecting diplomacy, ignoring feedback, and working independently can hold you back.
  8. Pitch Problems, Not Ideas, to Drive Innovation. By focusing on problems instead of ideas, you inspire collaboration and creative solutions. Problems resonate on an emotional level, engaging others, while ideas often meet resistance.
  9. Think Before You Drop That Truth Bomb. Before speaking your truth, ask yourself: Does it need to be said now, and by you? Consider timing and context, as sometimes holding back can preserve relationships and avoid unnecessary conflict.
  10. Lead with Toughness, Not Popularity. True leadership requires making difficult, sometimes unpopular decisions. Focus on organizational goals and facts, not personal approval.

And here are some articles of yesteryear that continue to be popular:

  • Lessons on adversity from Charlie Munger
  • How smart companies get smarter
  • If you’re looking for bad luck, you’ll soon find it
  • Get good at things by being bad first
  • To be more productive, try doing less
  • The power of negative thinking
  • Why it’s so hard to apologize
  • The Shoichi Yokoi Fallacy
  • Under pressure, the narrowing cognitive map
  • The Fermi Rule & Guesstimation

We wish you all a healthy and prosperous 2025!

Wondering what to read next?

  1. Our 10 Most Popular Articles of 2022
  2. Our 10 Most Popular Articles of 2023
  3. In Praise of Inner Voices: A Powerful Tool for Smarter Decisions
  4. Situational Blindness, Fatal Consequences
  5. Accidents Can Happen When You Least Expect Them: The Overconfidence Effect

Filed Under: Managing People, Mental Models, Sharpening Your Skills Tagged With: Critical Thinking, Decision-Making, Getting Along, Mindfulness, Thought Process

Some Worry is Useful

December 27, 2024 By Nagesh Belludi Leave a Comment

Some Worry is Useful - What Action Can You Take Now Worry can often feel overwhelming, but it usually serves a purpose. Some anxious thoughts can help you prepare, avoid surprises, and motivate action. To manage your worry effectively, ask yourself, “How is my worry helpful?” and “When does it become unproductive?”

Train yourself to differentiate between productive and unproductive thoughts. For instance, when preparing for a significant work presentation, channel your worry into action. Focus on researching your topic, creating slides, and practicing your delivery. This productive worry acts as your to-do list. In contrast, if you find yourself fretting about job loss, unproductive thoughts like “What if I can’t find a new job?” may arise. Instead of spiraling, take action—update your resume and start networking. If you’re worried about a family gathering, thoughts like “What if everyone argues?” distract you from what you can control. Instead, plan activities that foster conversation.

Idea for Impact: When worry strikes, ask, “Can I take action today?” If the answer is yes, get to work. Tackling your worries directly helps alleviate anxiety.

Wondering what to read next?

  1. Don’t Do the Easiest Jobs First
  2. Ask This One Question Every Morning to Find Your Focus
  3. Did School Turn You Into a Procrastinator?
  4. Why Doing a Terrible Job First Actually Works
  5. When Stress is Good

Filed Under: Living the Good Life, Mental Models, Sharpening Your Skills Tagged With: Anxiety, Decision-Making, Emotions, Getting Things Done, Introspection, Motivation, Procrastination, Task Management

An Effective Question to Help Feel the Success Now

November 30, 2024 By Nagesh Belludi Leave a Comment

An Effective Question to Help Feel the Success Now Bestselling author Tim Ferriss is known for his unconventional take on productivity and personal growth. He urges his audience to ask bold, thought-provoking questions—timeless wisdom in modern form.

One of his popular questions is: “If you had to accomplish your 10-year goals in six months, what would you do differently?” This challenge cuts through procrastination, forcing quick decisions and encouraging immediate action.

It drives you to focus on what truly matters, bringing clarity and pushing you beyond your comfort zone. It’s a mindset shift toward efficiency and innovation.

Idea for Impact: Don’t wait to fast-track your future. Ask the question, sharpen your focus, and make real progress now.

Wondering what to read next?

  1. How to Banish Your Inner Perfectionist
  2. Did School Turn You Into a Procrastinator?
  3. Change Your Mindset by Taking Action
  4. Use Friction to Make or Break Habits
  5. Why Doing a Terrible Job First Actually Works

Filed Under: Living the Good Life, Mental Models, Sharpening Your Skills Tagged With: Decision-Making, Discipline, Getting Things Done, Goals, Lifehacks, Motivation, Procrastination

‘Use it or Lose it’ Budget Syndrome

November 26, 2024 By Nagesh Belludi Leave a Comment

The Problem with 'Use it or Lose it' Budgeting As the fiscal year draws to a close, the annual spectacle of “use it or lose it” budget mayhem unfolds.

Caught in this whirlwind, departmental managers rush to burn through their budgets to avoid potential cuts in the upcoming year. This frenzy results in impulsive purchases, rushed projects, excess inventory, temporary hires, lavish team-building events, and premature contract renewals—all while the essential task of creating value for the company gets sidelined.

This rush-job approach stems from an outdated planning system that values appearances over genuine fiscal responsibility.

Idea for Impact: Consider a move towards more flexible, performance-based budgeting approaches by loosening rigid budget structures.

Wondering what to read next?

  1. Lessons from Peter Drucker: Quit What You Suck At
  2. The Best Leaders Make the Complex Simple
  3. Do Your Employees Feel Safe Enough to Tell You the Truth?
  4. How Toyota Thrives on Imperfection
  5. Looking at Problems from an Outsider’s Perspective

Filed Under: Business Stories, Leading Teams, MBA in a Nutshell Tagged With: Budgeting, Decision-Making, Leadership, Managing the Boss, Targets

« Previous Page
Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Popular Now

Anxiety Assertiveness Attitudes Balance Biases Coaching Conflict Conversations Creativity Critical Thinking Decision-Making Discipline Emotions Entrepreneurs Etiquette Feedback Getting Along Getting Things Done Goals Great Manager Leadership Leadership Lessons Likeability Mental Models Mentoring Mindfulness Motivation Networking Parables Performance Management Persuasion Philosophy Problem Solving Procrastination Relationships Simple Living Social Life Social Skills Stress Suffering Thinking Tools Thought Process Time Management Winning on the Job Wisdom

About: Nagesh Belludi [hire] is a St. Petersburg, Florida-based freethinker, investor, and leadership coach. He specializes in helping executives and companies ensure that the overall quality of their decision-making benefits isn’t compromised by a lack of a big-picture understanding.

Get Updates

Signup for emails

Subscribe via RSS

Contact Nagesh Belludi

RECOMMENDED BOOK:
The Art of War

The Art of War: Sun Tzu

The ancient Chinese master Sun Tzu reveals the essence of conflict and how to win by knowing yourself, knowing your enemy, and fighting only when you can win.

Explore

  • Announcements
  • Belief and Spirituality
  • Business Stories
  • Career Development
  • Effective Communication
  • Great Personalities
  • Health and Well-being
  • Ideas and Insights
  • Inspirational Quotations
  • Leadership
  • Leadership Reading
  • Leading Teams
  • Living the Good Life
  • Managing Business Functions
  • Managing People
  • MBA in a Nutshell
  • Mental Models
  • News Analysis
  • Personal Finance
  • Podcasts
  • Project Management
  • Proverbs & Maxims
  • Sharpening Your Skills
  • The Great Innovators

Recently,

  • Most Writing Is Bad Because It Doesn’t Know Why It Exists
  • Penang’s Clan Jetties: Collective Identity as Economic Infrastructure
  • Inspirational Quotations #1109
  • Flying Cramped Coach: The Economics of Self-Inflicted Misery
  • Affection Is No Defense: Good Intentions Make Excellent Alibis
  • Inspirational Quotations #1108
  • Disrupt Yourself, Expand Your Reach.

Unless otherwise stated in the individual document, the works above are © Nagesh Belludi under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND license. You may quote, copy and share them freely, as long as you link back to RightAttitudes.com, don't make money with them, and don't modify the content. Enjoy!