Leadership

This year, I took two long trips across the Balkans, focusing on the region’s turbulent 20th-century history.

Understanding the role of Yugoslav revolutionary leader Josip Broz Tito has been instrumental in grasping the complex ethnic relations, historical grievances, and aspirations that continue to shape the region’s identity and politics.

Tito’s regime demonstrates how a coercive leader can unite a fragmented people through sheer willpower. However, it also highlights how the absence of sustainable systems and institutions can lead to collapse once that leader is gone, as evidenced by the violent conflicts of the 1990s. Encyclopædia Britannica encapsulates on Tito’s legacy thus:

The irony of Tito’s remarkable life is that he created the conditions for the eventual destruction of his lifelong effort. Instead of allowing the process of democratization to establish its own limits, he constantly upset the work of reformers while failing to satisfy their adversaries. He created a federal state, yet he constantly fretted over the pitfalls of decentralization. He knew that the Serbs, Croats, Slovenes, and others could not be integrated within some new supranation, nor would they willingly accept the hegemony of any of their number; yet his supranational Yugoslavism frequently smacked of unitarism. He promoted self-management but never gave up on the party’s monopoly of power. He permitted broad freedoms in science, art, and culture that were unheard of in the Soviet bloc, but he kept excoriating the West. He preached peaceful coexistence but built an army that, in 1991, delivered the coup de grâce to the dying Yugoslav state. At his death, the state treasury was empty and political opportunists unchecked. He died too late for constructive change, too early to prevent chaos.

Tito was a charismatic and strong leader whose personal authority and presence were key to maintaining national cohesion. His doctrine of “Brotherhood and Unity” aimed to bridge Yugoslavia’s deep ethnic and national divides. However, the political institutions he left behind were weak and overly reliant on his personal authority, creating a power vacuum that no one could fill after his death in 1980.

The poem “Comrade Tito, from your path we will not stray!” written at the time of his death, was soon forgotten. It instead underscored the instability of the region’s political landscape and the futility of suppressing deep-seated ethnic and nationalist divisions through authoritarian rule. The federal structure Tito had established began to unravel, leading to violent conflicts.

Idea for Impact: Many leaders are skilled at rallying people around a common vision, instilling purpose and urgency. However, this often creates a dependency on the leader’s presence, making the system vulnerable to collapse once they are gone.