• Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Right Attitudes

Ideas for Impact

Biases

Situational Blindness, Fatal Consequences: Lessons from American Airlines 5342

February 1, 2025 By Nagesh Belludi Leave a Comment

How Situational Blindness Caused the American Airlines-Black Hawk Fatal Collision Near Reagan National Airport Earlier this week, I mentioned how accidents rarely result from a single cause, but rather from a series of factors that align to trigger disaster. On their own, these ‘contributing factors’ may seem minor, but together, they can lead to significant incidents, as was the case on Wednesday night.

An American Airlines flight (5342,) operated by American Eagle/PSA, collided with an Army Black Hawk helicopter near Reagan National Airport (DCA) in Washington D.C., sending both aircraft into the Potomac River. Tragically, all 60 passengers and 4 crew members aboard the flight, along with the 3 soldiers in the helicopter, lost their lives. Investigations are underway, but while it’s too early for deductions, it appears that a combination of factors contributed to this devastating event.

The Black Hawk was flying under Visual Flight Rules (VFR,) relying heavily on visual references to navigate. This required the pilots to maintain visual separation from other aircraft and use landmarks for guidance. Although typically crewed by four, this Black Hawk had only three personnel aboard. It is unclear whether a single pilot was at the controls, but the absence of a second pilot may have removed a crucial safety layer. In a high-traffic airspace like this, having two pilots flying allows for cross-checking decisions, reducing the risk of errors. Disorientation is a real danger, especially at night with lights reflecting off the river. A second pilot would have provided an additional perspective for decision-making, an extra set of eyes for maintaining visual separation, and crucial support for monitoring instruments and communicating with air traffic control, all of which enhance situational awareness.

The Black Hawk pilot can be heard on the radio confirming visual contact with the incoming aircraft, stating, “PAT 25 [call sign of the Black Hawk] has the traffic in sight, request visual separation.” This indicated that the pilot had assumed responsibility for maintaining a safe distance. The air traffic controller approved the request, effectively transferring collision avoidance duties to the helicopter crew. However, the Black Hawk was supposed to be flying at 200 feet but was instead at an altitude of 350 to 400 feet when the collision occurred—just as Flight 5342 was descending. This altitude discrepancy was a critical error and a key factor in the crash. Notably, just over 24 hours before this fatal incident, another American Eagle jet had to abort its landing after coming dangerously close to a helicopter in the same congested airspace.

There may also have been confusion about which aircraft the Black Hawk needed to avoid. The pilot may have mistakenly identified a different aircraft—either one following Flight 5342 in the landing sequence or another departing from the airport. Although air traffic control communications followed standard procedures, clearer identification of aircraft could have helped prevent the tragedy.

Ultimately, the crash suggests that a series of mistakes—misidentification, altitude discrepancies, and the challenges of navigating busy airspace—may have contributed to the collision. While the Black Hawk was highly maneuverable and could have potentially adjusted its course, these errors seem to have compounded, making avoidance increasingly difficult.

Wondering what to read next?

  1. The “Ashtray in the Sky” Mental Model: Idiot-Proofing by Design
  2. Accidents Can Happen When You Least Expect Them: The Overconfidence Effect
  3. How Contributing Factors Stack Up and Accidents Unfold: A Case Study of the 2024 Delta A350 & CRJ-900 Collision
  4. Question the Now, Imagine the Next
  5. What Airline Disasters Teach About Cognitive Impairment and Decision-Making Under Stress

Filed Under: Effective Communication, Mental Models, Sharpening Your Skills Tagged With: Aviation, Biases, Confidence, Critical Thinking, Decision-Making, Mindfulness, Problem Solving, Thinking Tools, Thought Process

How Contributing Factors Stack Up and Accidents Unfold: A Case Study of the 2024 Delta A350 & CRJ-900 Collision

January 27, 2025 By Nagesh Belludi Leave a Comment

Delta Air Lines A350-900 Strikes CRJ-900 in Atlanta 2024: A Case Study of Contributing Factors and Accident Progression

Accidents rarely result from a single cause but rather from a sequence of situations where various contributing factors align to set disaster in motion. Individually, these factors may seem inconsequential, but when combined, they can escalate into major incidents. Understanding these interconnected aspects can help you transition from reactive responses to proactive accident prevention.

A recent case study involves a ground collision (see visual reconstruction) at Atlanta airport on 10-Sep-2024 between a Delta Air Lines Airbus A350 and a Bombardier CRJ-900 regional jet. While taxiing, the A350’s right wingtip struck the CRJ-900’s vertical stabilizer, resulting in significant damage to the smaller aircraft and minor damage to the A350. The incident remains under investigation, with preliminary findings suggesting that communication gaps, ground movement protocols, and situational awareness issues contributed to the collision.

  • CRJ-900 Positioning. While taxiing for departure, the Endeavor Air/Delta Connection CRJ-900 stopped 56 feet short of the designated hold short line on the taxiway. Although it could have positioned closer in preparation for entering the runway, its position did not violate procedural regulations, which only require that no part of the aircraft extend beyond the hold short line, without specifying a minimum stopping distance. However, had the CRJ-900 taxied closer, the collision with the passing A350 could have been avoided.
  • Delta Air Lines A350-900 Collides with Endeavor Air/Delta Connection CRJ-900 in Atlanta A350 Crew Distraction. While taxiing on an intersecting taxiway, the A350 flight crew detected a maintenance alert on the dashboard. They requested permission to stop on the taxiway to promptly investigate the issue and consult with company maintenance. However, ATC, likely prioritizing traffic flow, denied the request and instructed them to continue past the CRJ-900 before stopping again. Despite this, the crew chose to address the alert while taxiing, leading to a distraction at a critical moment as they passed the other aircraft.
  • Situational Awareness Challenges. Preoccupied with the maintenance alert, the A350 pilots failed to notice the close proximity of the CRJ-900. The cockpit also included two relief crew members—the relief captain and relief first officer—who, like the primary crew, failed to recognize the risk. Positioned on the starboard side, it was the first officer’s responsibility to ensure sufficient clearance. However, distractions impaired their situational awareness and decision-making. Standard protocol dictates that, when in doubt about clearances, pilots should stop, set the brakes, and address issues without multitasking.

As mentioned earlier, the incident is still under investigation, but I believe the ultimate responsibility for avoiding obstacles lies with the distracted A350 crew. Although they followed ATC instructions and stayed on the taxiway’s centerline, the crew should have remained more vigilant. Neither ATC nor the A350 crew noticed that the CRJ-900 was positioned in a way that prevented the A350’s wingtip from clearing it.

Given the limited visibility of the wingtip from the A350 flight deck, it’s pilots should have stopped if they were unsure about clearance. This event highlights the need for improved Crew Resource Management (CRM) training to enhance teamwork, decision-making, and vigilance. Standard procedures emphasize stopping, setting the parking brake, and seeking assistance when obstacles are suspected. Flight crews must maintain spatial awareness and heightened perception of surrounding aircraft, even while managing other operational tasks.

Idea for Impact: Recognizing accidents as the result of interconnected contributing factors emphasizes the importance of addressing not only individual issues but also how they interact within the system.

Wondering what to read next?

  1. Lessons from the World’s Worst Aviation Disaster // Book Summary of ‘The Collision on Tenerife’
  2. “Fly the Aircraft First”
  3. Under Pressure, The Narrowing Cognitive Map: Lessons from the Tragedy of Singapore Airlines Flight 6
  4. Pulling Off the Impossible Under Immense Pressure: Leadership Lessons from Captain Sully
  5. Situational Blindness, Fatal Consequences: Lessons from American Airlines 5342

Filed Under: Effective Communication, Mental Models, Sharpening Your Skills Tagged With: Aviation, Biases, Conflict, Decision-Making, Mindfulness, Problem Solving, Stress, Thinking Tools

The Business of Popular Causes

January 22, 2025 By Nagesh Belludi Leave a Comment

Starbucks:Championing Progressive Causes, While Undermining Unionization Efforts Starbucks has long been celebrated for its progressive image and support of social justice causes. But when it comes to unionization and better benefits, the company’s actions tell a different story. Internal policies—like cracking down on union activities—raise doubts about how committed it truly is to the values it champions.

Starbucks is a prime example of a wider trend: companies quickly embrace progressive causes, but only when they don’t hurt the bottom line. This is Bandwagon Branding—when businesses latch onto the latest popular cause, whether it’s social justice, climate change, or equality, to align with dominant public values. They roll out hashtags, social media campaigns, and limited-edition products to show support. But once the spotlight fades, they quietly move on to the next issue. Remember when founder-CEO Howard Schultz launched the “Race Together” initiative, letting baristas at 12,000 locations write it on cups to spark conversations about race?

This cycle—big gestures, minimal change, quick pivots—reveals a harsh truth: corporations are profit-driven. Their true loyalty is to shareholders, not social causes. Corporate virtue-signaling often rings hollow.

Wondering what to read next?

  1. The Loss Aversion Mental Model: A Case Study on Why People Think Spirit is a Horrible Airline
  2. When Global Ideas Hit a Wall: BlaBlaCar in America
  3. Consumer Power Is Shifting and Consumer Packaged Goods Companies Are Struggling
  4. Your Product May Be Excellent, But Is There A Market For It?
  5. The Wisdom of the Well-Timed Imperfection: The ‘Pratfall Effect’ and Authenticity

Filed Under: Business Stories, Leadership, MBA in a Nutshell Tagged With: Biases, Diversity, Entrepreneurs, Group Dynamics, Humility, Marketing, Persuasion, Starbucks

Being Situational

January 21, 2025 By Nagesh Belludi Leave a Comment

Situational Leadership: Effective Leaders Adjust Their Approach When someone asks, “What’s your leadership or managerial style?” the best response often comes down to, “It depends.”

Leadership doesn’t mean sticking to a fixed style—it requires adapting to what the situation demands. While leadership models like authentic, transformational, and servant leadership offer useful insights, taking a situational approach works best. You need to assess the moment and respond with the right style.

Evaluate what the situation calls for. When you need to set firm boundaries, showing frustration sends a clear message. If your team lacks the necessary skills, getting hands-on and micromanaging the tasks drives results. On the other hand, when your team knows what they’re doing, stepping back and offering periodic guidance keeps things on track. Using the same style everywhere rarely delivers the right results.

Idea for Impact: Right style, right time. That’s effective leadership.

Wondering what to read next?

  1. Lessons from Peter Drucker: Quit What You Suck At
  2. Steering the Course: Leadership’s Flight with the Instrument Scan Mental Model
  3. Why Incentives Backfire and How to Make Them Work: Summary of Uri Gneezy’s Mixed Signals
  4. Knowing When to Give Up: Establish ‘Kill Criteria’
  5. Availability Heuristic: Our Preference for the Familiar

Filed Under: Leading Teams, Mental Models, Project Management Tagged With: Biases, Decision-Making, Discipline, Leadership, Management, Mental Models, Mindfulness, Psychology

How Ads Turn Us into Dreamers

November 27, 2024 By Nagesh Belludi Leave a Comment

How Ads Turn Us into Dreamers through Emotional Baiting Advertisements used to be straightforward, focusing on what a product did and whether you needed it. Simple as that.

Then came a shift—a bit of sleight of hand, really. As consumer culture evolved, advertisers tapped into the power of emotional appeal. With the rise of mass media, lifestyle advertising emerged, connecting products with aspirational images and ideals.

Pioneers like David Ogilvy and Leo Burnett led this change, showing how products could enhance personal identity, success, and social status. Ads for brands like Ferrari and Mercedes-Benz started selling more than just cars—they sold desires like power, achievement, and prestige. The message became, “Own this, and you’ll get that.”

To me, the problem isn’t the desires themselves but the ineffective ways we pursue them. Recognizing what truly fulfills your desires can lead to mindful consumption—you’ll spend in ways that align with your values and reduce impulse buys.

Idea for Impact: Materialism is shallow. The symbols of prestige, security, power, and self-worth—like Chanel, Gucci, and Louis Vuitton—are empty. Unless you project meaning onto them.

Wondering what to read next?

  1. The Extra Salary You Can Negotiate Ain’t Gonna Make You Happy
  2. Here’s the #1 Lesson from Secret Millionaires
  3. The ‘Buy More’ Madness Has to End
  4. The Problem with Modern Consumer Culture
  5. Conspicuous Consumption and The Era of Excess // Book Summary of ‘Luxury Fever’

Filed Under: Living the Good Life, Personal Finance Tagged With: Biases, Marketing, Materialism, Money, Personal Finance, Persuasion, Simple Living

How to … Escape the Overthinking Trap

October 28, 2024 By Nagesh Belludi Leave a Comment

Escape the Overthinking Trap: Shift Focus, Let Go, and Cultivate Resilience Spending too much time trapped in your own head, especially when those thoughts are critical or judgmental, can take a serious toll on your emotional health. This is particularly true when you’re stuck replaying unwanted memories or negative experiences. We often give our thoughts more weight than they deserve, and rarely do we see ourselves with the clear-eyed objectivity needed.

When you feel overwhelmed by these thoughts, break the cycle by redirecting your focus to a different activity or line of thinking. It’s important to remember that rumination isn’t the same as problem-solving or planning—it’s unproductive dwelling.

One effective strategy is to set aside a specific time to address your concerns. Give yourself a set window to think things through. You’ll often find that you either run out of things to worry about before the time is up or make progress, even if it’s just a small step forward. This “worry time” helps prevent rumination from creeping in throughout the day, allowing you to stay on track with other tasks.

Another tip is to write down your thoughts instead of letting them spiral inside your head. Constant self-criticism is counterproductive and only deepens the problem. Jot down a brief summary of what’s on your mind. Remember, many issues tend to work themselves out with time or lose their importance altogether. Talking to someone else can also help you gain a fresh perspective.

Idea for Impact: Focusing too much on yourself can set impossible expectations and lead to frustration. Instead of worrying about things you can’t control, shift your energy toward what you can influence, and let the rest go. Resilience—the ability to bounce back from setbacks—is one of the key traits that distinguishes successful people from the rest.

Wondering what to read next?

  1. The “Ashtray in the Sky” Mental Model: Idiot-Proofing by Design
  2. Smart Folks are Most Susceptible to Overanalyzing and Overthinking
  3. Accidents Can Happen When You Least Expect Them: The Overconfidence Effect
  4. Five Ways … You Could Avoid Being Wrong
  5. Sometimes a Conflict is All About the Process

Filed Under: Mental Models, Sharpening Your Skills Tagged With: Assertiveness, Biases, Confidence, Critical Thinking, Decision-Making, Perfectionism, Risk

Can’t Control What You Can’t

June 3, 2024 By Nagesh Belludi Leave a Comment

Stoic Control Test: Can't Control What You Can't During the period spanning from 300 BCE to the third century CE, Stoicism flourished as a profound source of guidance, providing comfort to many individuals enduring profound adversity. Its significance declined with the emergence of Christianity, but the essence of Stoicism has experienced a revival in the present era. An increasing number of people are now reconnecting with its enduring significance and gaining valuable insights into the complexities of our modern world.

The crux of Stoic philosophy finds its essence in the Control Test, articulated in the Handbook or Enchiridion, a collection of lectures by the Roman Stoic Epictetus. He succinctly states: “Within our power are opinion, motivation, desire, aversion, and, in a word, whatever is of our own doing; not within our power are our body, our property, reputation, office, and, in a word, whatever is not of our own doing.” This underscores that our sphere of influence encompasses our actions, reactions, desires, character, and interactions with others. Everything else—our physical bodies, the actions of others, our reputations, and our material fortunes—lies beyond our control.

You’re eyeing someone special and hoping they’ll catch feelings? Sorry, but that’s out of your hands.

Stuck in bumper-to-bumper traffic? Yep, out of your control too.

Dealing with family drama during the holidays? That’s a mix. Some of it you can manage with good communication and setting boundaries, but some things are just beyond your control.

Running short on time? Well, you’ve got a bit of control there too. By managing your time wisely and prioritizing, you can make the most of what you’ve got.

Feeling the pressure of academics? You’ve got some say in that. How? Well, by building good study habits, managing your time well, and reaching out for help when you need it.

Dreaming of landing that perfect job? Sure, you can toss in an application, but who’ll hired? Well, that’s not up to you.

Getting older? Well, that’s mostly out of your control, though making healthy choices can slow things down a bit.

Got hit with a cancer diagnosis? You can give it your all to fight it, but sometimes even the best treatment can’t stop it from spreading.

Idea for Impact: Make the lens of Stoic Control the cornerstone of your daily concerns. It’ll aid you in pinpointing where to channel your energy for maximum effectiveness, alleviating stress, and, crucially, maintaining perspective.

Wondering what to read next?

  1. I’ll Be Happy When …
  2. 3 Ways to … Get Wiser
  3. What a Daily Stoic Practice Actually Looks Like
  4. Anger Is Often Pointless
  5. What It Means to Lead a Philosophical Life

Filed Under: Health and Well-being, Living the Good Life, Managing People, Mental Models Tagged With: Attitudes, Biases, Mindfulness, Philosophy, Simple Living, Wisdom

Embracing Cultural Sensitivity: A Case Study of Akira Kurosawa’s Oscar Speech

May 6, 2024 By Nagesh Belludi Leave a Comment

Consider the acceptance speech delivered by the renowned director Akira Kurosawa when he received the Honorary Award at the 62nd Academy Awards in 1989. This award recognized his lifetime achievements and his significant impact on filmmaking, both in Japan and internationally.

I am very deeply honored to receive such a wonderful prize, but I have to ask whether I really deserve it. I’m a little worried, because I don’t feel that I understand cinema yet. I really don’t feel that I have yet grasped the essence of cinema. Cinema is a marvelous thing, but to grasp its true essence is very, very difficult. But what I promise you is that from now on I will work as hard as I can at making movies and maybe by following this path I will achieve an understanding of the true essence of cinema and earn this award. George [Lucas], Steven [Spielberg]. Thank you.

In the Western world, some may perceive this language as a display of false modesty. It appears that the legendary Kurosawa, whose cinematic genius revolutionized storytelling, downplays his abilities and achievements, seemingly deflecting praise.

Let’s Be Cautious Not to Impose Norms We Call Our Own

While Kurosawa’s speech might come across as insincere or disingenuous, it’s important to consider cultural relativism. Different cultures have varying values, norms, and philosophical perspectives. What might be seen as a positive sentiment in one culture can be perceived differently in another.

Respecting Diversity: Avoiding Imposing Personal Norms As this case study illustrates, the concept of humility in Asian cultures may differ from that in Western cultures. Many Eastern cultures approach humility not merely as an understanding of personal limits, but as a way to let go of the self, understand one’s place in the larger scheme of existence, and connect with a greater reality. (In contrast, Western traditions, for they’re based in Abrahamic traditions, often conceptualize humility as submission to God.) Eastern traditions encourage adopting a particular perspective on life, focusing on understanding the small role one plays in a vast universe, appreciating others, and recognizing their inherent worth. For instance, in Buddhism, one of the elements of the eight-fold path is “right intention,” which involves freeing oneself from selfishness, partly achieved through humble thought.

Idea for Impact: Cultural sensitivity is essential to avoid unintentional offense. Interpreting sentiments and communication within the cultural and philosophical context of the individuals involved is crucial for effective cross-cultural understanding and respect.

Wondering what to read next?

  1. There’s Real Danger in Religious Illiteracy
  2. Labeling Damage
  3. Racism and Identity: The Lie of Labeling
  4. Ethics Lessons From Akira Kurosawa’s ‘High and Low’
  5. What Appears Self-Evident to One May Be Entirely Opaque to Another: How the Dalai Lama Apology Highlights Cultural Relativism

Filed Under: Leading Teams, Managing People, Mental Models Tagged With: Attitudes, Biases, Buddhism, Conflict, Diversity, Ethics, Getting Along, Group Dynamics, Philosophy

The Deceptive Power of False Authority: A Case Study of Linus Pauling’s Vitamin C Promotion

May 2, 2024 By Nagesh Belludi Leave a Comment


The Allure of the Famous Word

The Deceptive Power of False Authority: A Case Study of Linus Pauling's Vitamin C Promotion In the 1970s and 1980s, Linus Pauling, the American chemist with not one but two Nobel Prizes to his name, started championing the extraordinary potential of mega-doses of Vitamin C (ascorbic acid) as a wide-ranging panacea—a solution to a myriad of ailments, in fact—from the common cold to cancer and even heart disease.

The world of medicine and science didn’t greet Pauling’s bold claims with open arms. Skepticism abounded, and rightly so. The reason? A scarcity of compelling scientific evidence to bolster his audacious assertions. Leading medical institutions turned a critical eye toward his ideas, raising ethical red flags. They feared that people might be swayed to forgo established medical treatments based solely on the strength of a seemingly authoritative endorsement of Pauling.

This controversy is a classic case in point of a brilliant person daring to traverse the boundaries of his expertise, venturing into unqualified territories. While a handful of studies explored the potential benefits, a universally accepted scientific consensus on the effectiveness of high-dose Vitamin C for these purposes remained frustratingly elusive. And even today, Pauling’s views on Vitamin C’s health benefits continue to spark fierce debates.

Truth Demands a Deeper Call

Make no mistake; Linus Pauling was a luminary in the realm of chemistry, but his credentials didn’t extend to the domain of medicine. This tale serves as a reminder that intelligence and judgment are not always cut from the same cloth. While Pauling’s claims may hold water in the world of chemistry, blindly accepting his assertions on Vitamin C would lead us down a path of fallacy – the “false appeal to authority,” or “Argument from Authority,” also known as “Argumentum ad Verecundiam.”

Celebrity endorsements, expert testimonies, and references to popular figures in non-expert fields can be a deceptive trap for those who unquestionably trust the statements of authorities. The assumption that truth is inherent in the words of a prominent figure, regardless of solid evidence or sound reasoning, undermines critical evaluation and neglects the necessity for substantial support.

Idea for Impact: Brilliance in one arena doesn’t guarantee infallibility across the board. Approach “expert” opinions with a critical eye, assessing them within the context of the evidence and rationale that underpin the argument. In the quest for understanding, always judge each assertion on its own merits. Context matters.

Wondering what to read next?

  1. Expanding the Narrative: Servant Leadership beyond Christianity
  2. Question Success More Than Failure
  3. The Barnum Effect and the Appeal of Vagueness
  4. Choose Your Role Models Carefully
  5. Accidents Can Happen When You Least Expect Them: The Overconfidence Effect

Filed Under: Great Personalities, Mental Models, Sharpening Your Skills Tagged With: Biases, Critical Thinking, Humility, Integrity, Mindfulness, Parables, Persuasion, Role Models

Tales vs. Truth & Anecdotal Evidence: The Case of Sports Illustrated Cover Jinx

April 11, 2024 By Nagesh Belludi Leave a Comment

Tales vs. Truth & Anecdotal Evidence: The Case of Sports Illustrated Cover Jinx Stories and anecdotes can wield considerable influence, often dished out as ‘compelling’ evidence to support specific claims and evoke strong emotional responses. However, as much as they can be persuasive and resonate deeply, their effectiveness is not without limitations.

Take, for instance, the Sports Illustrated (SI) Cover Jinx, a widely discussed superstition suggesting that athletes or teams gracing the magazine’s cover may experience a subsequent decline in performance or encounter some misfortune. Wikipedia maintains a long list of the teams and athletes who’ve been hit by the jinx—some managed to dodge it—since the magazine’s inception in 1954.

An oft-cited example is the August 31, 2015, issue of SI, which featured a cover photo of tennis superstar Serena Williams looking at the ball she’d just tossed in the air to serve. The headline reads, “All Eyes on Serena: The Slam.” No sooner than the issue hit the newsstands did Serena lose in the semifinals of the US Open, thus ending her bid to win a calendar-year Grand Slam.

Anecdotes are captivating because they provide concrete, relatable illustrations of abstract ideas, making them more engaging and memorable. However, anecdotes are inherently limited in their scope and representativeness. Just because something is true in one instance doesn’t mean it holds true universally. Anecdotes are susceptible to bias, selective memory, and cherry-picking.

There is no empirical evidence to support the existence of the Sports Illustrated Cover Jinx, yet the jinx has become a part of sports folklore and continues to be mentioned humorously by athletes, sports commentators, and fans alike. Various factors contribute to the jinx, including the fact that these athletes are already at their peak (Serena Williams was nearly 34 when featured on the SI cover,) and statistically, peak success can’t last forever.

Idea for Impact: Overgeneralization and drawing sweeping conclusions based on isolated examples can lead to erroneous beliefs and misguided actions. Always approach anecdotes critically and with a healthy dose of skepticism. When presented with anecdotal evidence, consider its relevance, cause-and-effect representativeness, and the possibility of alternative explanations. Isolated cases do not necessarily reflect broader truths.

Wondering what to read next?

  1. The Data Never “Says”
  2. What if Something Can’t Be Measured
  3. Of Course Mask Mandates Didn’t ‘Work’—At Least Not for Definitive Proof
  4. The “Ashtray in the Sky” Mental Model: Idiot-Proofing by Design
  5. Accidents Can Happen When You Least Expect Them: The Overconfidence Effect

Filed Under: Mental Models, Sharpening Your Skills Tagged With: Biases, Critical Thinking, Decision-Making, Parables, Persuasion, Thinking Tools

« Previous Page
Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Popular Now

Anxiety Assertiveness Attitudes Balance Biases Coaching Conflict Conversations Creativity Critical Thinking Decision-Making Discipline Emotions Entrepreneurs Etiquette Feedback Getting Along Getting Things Done Goals Great Manager Innovation Leadership Leadership Lessons Likeability Mental Models Mentoring Mindfulness Motivation Networking Parables Performance Management Persuasion Philosophy Problem Solving Procrastination Relationships Simple Living Social Skills Stress Suffering Thinking Tools Thought Process Time Management Winning on the Job Wisdom

About: Nagesh Belludi [hire] is a St. Petersburg, Florida-based freethinker, investor, and leadership coach. He specializes in helping executives and companies ensure that the overall quality of their decision-making benefits isn’t compromised by a lack of a big-picture understanding.

Get Updates

Signup for emails

Subscribe via RSS

Contact Nagesh Belludi

RECOMMENDED BOOK:
A Guide to the Good Life

A Guide to the Good Life: William Irvine

Philosophy professor William Irvine's practical handbook includes actionable advice for self-improvement by applying the ancient stoic wisdom to contemporary life.

Explore

  • Announcements
  • Belief and Spirituality
  • Business Stories
  • Career Development
  • Effective Communication
  • Great Personalities
  • Health and Well-being
  • Ideas and Insights
  • Inspirational Quotations
  • Leadership
  • Leadership Reading
  • Leading Teams
  • Living the Good Life
  • Managing Business Functions
  • Managing People
  • MBA in a Nutshell
  • Mental Models
  • News Analysis
  • Personal Finance
  • Podcasts
  • Project Management
  • Proverbs & Maxims
  • Sharpening Your Skills
  • The Great Innovators

Recently,

  • What Appears Self-Evident to One May Be Entirely Opaque to Another: How the Dalai Lama Apology Highlights Cultural Relativism
  • Inspirational Quotations #1136
  • Ditch Deadlines That Deceive
  • Invention is Refined Theft
  • You Need to Stop Turning Warren Buffett Into a Prophet
  • Inspirational Quotations #1135
  • What the Dry January Trap Shows Us About Extremes

Unless otherwise stated in the individual document, the works above are © Nagesh Belludi under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND license. You may quote, copy and share them freely, as long as you link back to RightAttitudes.com, don't make money with them, and don't modify the content. Enjoy!