The concentration of power in corporate boardrooms is one of those problems that everybody in business acknowledges and almost nobody does anything about.
The mechanics are well understood. When a CEO also chairs the board, board members nominated by that same CEO become reluctant to challenge the person who elevated them. Probing questions don’t get asked. Polished reports get accepted at face value. The board’s fundamental purpose—identifying problems before they become crises—quietly erodes.
None of this is new. It’s taught in business schools and cited in the preamble of every major corporate scandal after the fact. And that’s precisely what’s so dispiriting about it.
Whenever governance fails spectacularly enough to make headlines, a reliable sequence follows. Professors surface with op-eds. The financial press runs its accountability cycle. There’s a brief, serious-sounding conversation about reform, and then the moment passes and the structural problem remains exactly where it was.
The argument for separating the CEO and board chair roles has been made clearly and repeatedly for decades. It’s not a contested point. The resistance isn’t intellectual—it comes from powerful CEOs who need board members willing to make noise, but never quite enough of it. That’s a much easier arrangement to maintain than it should be.
The governance community keeps waiting for the next crisis to reopen the conversation. It always does. And then, just as reliably, it closes again without resolution.
McDonald’s and Taco Bell use dollar menus as bait—cheap hooks to reel in customers. Chipotle refuses to join that .jpg)
This is what gut feeling actually does in complex decisions. It doesn’t replace analysis; it registers when one factor has grown large enough to settle the question on its own. What
One of the most useful questions in design is deceptively simple: What experience would 
.jpg)
Ryanair’s CEO Michael O’Leary has long been one of my most admired businessmen. His achievements speak for themselves, but what has always impressed me even more is the consistency of his communication and the clarity of the philosophy that underpins everything he does.
His flair for humorous controversy goes back years. During a 2001
In 2012, Google’s
It’s a curious feature of our age that we still require, by law, ashtrays in the lavatories of commercial aircraft. Not because we’re nostalgic for the days when the skies were thick with the fug of unfiltered Marlboros, but because—despite decades of prohibition—someone, somewhere, will inevitably decide the rules
Few phrases in the sales playbook are as overused and quietly harmful as “going after the low-hanging fruit.” It promises quick wins, fast cash flow, and a morale boost. In the short term, it delivers. These easy deals validate a pitch, energize a team, and keep the lights on. When immediacy becomes a guiding belief,