Most people deflect a compliment within a second of hearing it.
“Oh, it was nothing” and “this old thing?” come out before the praise has finished landing, and the habit usually passes for modesty.
Its source is more ordinary. Receiving praise is exposing, because someone has been watching you, formed an opinion, and said it aloud. Deflecting ends that moment quickly.
The reflex takes four common forms. Some people minimize (“it was nothing,”) some shift credit (“the slides did most of the work,”) some correct the speaker (“this old thing?,”) and some return the compliment on the spot (“you look great too.”)
Each one feels polite to the person doing it.
The person giving the compliment experiences it differently. Praise carries a small risk, since it can be brushed off, doubted, or taken as flattery.
If you answer “Oh god, I’m a mess today” to “You look nice,” the giver is left feeling they misjudged you or embarrassed you. Few people intend that, and fewer notice it.
The effect carries into work. Colleagues whose feedback gets waved away tend to offer less of it, and a manager who deflects praise gradually loses an honest read on how the team sees the work.
The fix: just say “thank you,” make eye contact, and stop.
“Thank you, that means a lot” and “Thanks for noticing” both work.
The same words handle flattery, since they acknowledge the gesture without agreeing with it.
If you want to credit someone else, do it in a separate sentence after the thanks, and only when the credit is true: “Thank you. Maria built most of the analysis.”
A compliment in return can wait until it can stand on its own.
Cultural norms shape this advice. Where modesty is expected, a ritual deflection is a polite move, and the guidance here reflects American conventions. Within those conventions, a plain thank you settles the exchange. It tells the giver that the observation was welcome and worth making.
Idea for Impact: Say thank you and stop, because accepting praise gracefully respects the person who noticed.
All you need to start a company today is a phone, an internet connection, and a credit card. That’s the easy part, which is why so many people 
The Stoics would recognize the shape of that problem. 
Chow and Su, by contrast, can say why they’re holding back: they refuse to become what was done to them. That’s the difference between a cage and a choice. 
Interruptions can derail a conversation, making it feel disjointed and disrespectful. It’s more than just irritating—it disrupts the flow and leaves the speaker 
We’ve all encountered overtalkers—those who dominate conversations and turn a lively exchange into a monologue. Sometimes, we even catch ourselves doing the same. Handling these chatterboxes can feel exhausting, especially when every attempt to contribute 
.jpg "'How Emotions Are Made' by Lisa Feldman Barrett (ISBN 0544133315)")
The modern leader has learned what politicians figured out decades ago: control the narrative, and you can postpone accountability. The tragedy is that journalists eventually interrogate public figures, while leaders are too often judged by the glowing autobiographies they write about themselves on LinkedIn.
Years ago, I was dragged to a yoga class in Michigan. The instructor was cheerful, dressed head to toe in athleisure that cost more than my first bicycle, and armed with a certificate acquired somewhere between freshman lectures and spring break. Halfway through the class, she corrected my pronunciation of Vīrabhadrāsana.
Consider Baba Ramdev, saffron-robed television yogi with millions of followers and a company named after Patañjali himself, the sage of liberation. You might expect a firm carrying that name to sell liberation. It sells toothpaste, biscuits, and noodles. During the pandemic, the company promoted a herbal product with claims of COVID benefits, and India’s Supreme Court later pushed it into publishing