Right Attitudes

Ideas for Impact

Social Dynamics

The Double-Edged Sword of a Strong Organizational Culture

By Leave a Comment

The Double-Edged Sword of a Strong Organizational Culture Peter Drucker’s famous phrase, “culture eats strategy for breakfast,” underscores the vital importance of nurturing internal cultures within organizations. A robust organizational culture possesses a powerful influence, shaping the work environment, molding employees’ mindsets, and ultimately determining the organization’s overall success. The pursuit of cultivating workplace cultures has led to a plethora of models and methodologies, propagated by business schools and leadership consultants.

However, the enthusiasm for strong cultures as a cure-all for leadership challenges should be balanced with an understanding of the complexities they introduce.

While strong cultures offer undeniable advantages, they can unintentionally encourage groupthink, stifling diversity of thought and hindering adaptability to changing circumstances. Dissenting voices and alternative values may be marginalized or even excluded, all in the name of maintaining cultural consistency and safeguarding cultural alignment. This can create substantial pressure for individuals to conform.

Idea for Impact: Well-established cultures often resist change and deviations from established norms, sometimes regarding non-conformists as threats to the existing order. Strike a delicate balance between cultural cohesion and a deliberate focus on diversity and inclusion.

Wondering what to read next?

  1. Why You May Be Overlooking Your Best Talent
  2. Penang’s Clan Jetties: Collective Identity as Economic Infrastructure
  3. Let Others Shine
  4. The ‘Small’ Challenge for Big Companies
  5. The Duplicity of Corporate Diversity Initiatives

Let Others Shine

By Leave a Comment

Let Others Shine Got a brilliant idea? Share it freely and let others get in on the action.

Let them win. Let them look good.

Let them steal the spotlight and snag some of the credit.

Let everyone get a piece of the glory and bask in the collective success.

You’ll be amazed at how quickly things get done.

You’ll create a culture of collaboration that drives even greater achievements.

Idea for Impact: Help others win—when they shine, your own star rises faster.

Wondering what to read next?

  1. The Double-Edged Sword of a Strong Organizational Culture
  2. Buy Yourself Time
  3. The Curse of Teamwork: Groupthink
  4. Why You May Be Overlooking Your Best Talent
  5. Doesn’t Facebook Make You Unhappy?

The Pros and Cons of Leading by Consensus: Compromise and Accountability

By Leave a Comment

Leading by Consensus: Compromise and Accountability Some HR folks encourage a consensual leadership style, where decisions are made through shared information and collaboration. This approach makes employees feel valued, fostering a harmonious and productive team. Plus, diverse viewpoints lead to well-rounded decisions (as with the Japanese Ringi-Seido decision-making process) that gain widespread support.

However, finding consensus requires extensive discussion, negotiation, and agreement, which can be time-consuming and slow decisions, especially when quick action is needed. Overemphasis on consensus can also stifle genuine opinions, creating a ‘herd mentality’ and making it hard for unique perspectives to be heard. Consensus often leads to compromises, resulting in middle-ground decisions rather than the best solutions. Additionally, shared responsibility can obscure accountability if things go wrong, even if the focus is on problem-solving rather than blame.

Idea for Impact: Consensus is not the goal; making the right call is. A manager’s job is to ensure all perspectives are heard and considered, and if necessary, to break ties and make the final decision.

Wondering what to read next?

  1. Consensus is Dangerous
  2. Ask for Forgiveness, Not Permission
  3. The Abilene Paradox: Just ‘Cause Everyone Agrees Doesn’t Mean They Do
  4. Never Make a Big Decision Without Doing This First
  5. The Curse of Teamwork: Groupthink

Why Group Brainstorming Falls Short on Creativity and How to Improve It

By Leave a Comment

Why Group Brainstorming Falls Short on Creativity and How to Improve It Seventy years ago, American advertising executive Alex Osborn impacted the field of management with his book Applied Imagination (1953.) This groundbreaking work introduced the concept of brainstorming, marking the beginning of a more collaborative and inclusive approach to leadership. At that time, the prevailing style of leadership was characterized by command-and-control, emphasizing silos and solitary decision-making. Executives relied on traditional chalkboard to-do lists to guide their actions.

Psychologists investigating the “illusion of group productivity” quickly discovered a significant flaw in brainstorming. Despite its intention to boost creativity and generate numerous ideas through collaboration, group brainstorming proved less effective than individual brainstorming, followed by the pooling of ideas.

Here’s an enhanced version of the group brainstorming practice that can foster better and more daring ideas. Begin by providing individuals or pairs with personal space for separate contemplation, allowing their thoughts to wander freely. Then, encourage them to share their ideas, including the unconventional and impractical ones, to ignite the group brainstorming session. This approach eliminates the awkwardness of everyone staring at each other in silence. Instead, it creates an environment conducive to fruitful discussions. It prevents anyone from monopolizing the conversation, attempting to prove others wrong, impressing superiors, or simply rambling for personal amusement. Furthermore, this approach effectively guards against premature judgment, which stifles creativity.

Wondering what to read next?

  1. How to Stimulate Group Creativity // Book Summary of Edward de Bono’s ‘Six Thinking Hats’
  2. Many Creative People Think They Can Invent Best Working Solo
  3. Empower Your Problem-Solving with the Initial Hypothesis Method
  4. Lessons from the Japanese Decision-Making Process
  5. Better Than Brainstorming

Empower Your Problem-Solving with the Initial Hypothesis Method

By Leave a Comment

Empower Your Problem-Solving with the Initial Hypothesis Method McKinsey, the renowned management consultancy firm, is celebrated for its rigorous problem-solving methodology, famously known as the ‘McKinsey Way.’ This structured approach is centered on the concept of the Initial Hypothesis. When confronted with complex business challenges, McKinsey consultants embark on a process that begins with formulating an educated guess about the underlying issues or opportunities. This initial hypothesis isn’t mere speculation; it’s firmly rooted in preliminary research, data analysis, and market trends.

McKinsey’s Hypothesis-Driven Approach to Problem Solving

'The McKinsey Way' by Ethan Rasiel (ISBN 0070534489) Leveraging their deep industry expertise, McKinsey consultants draw upon their knowledge of similar situations to craft this initial hypothesis. It serves as the foundation for further investigation, offering a structured framework for problem-solving and acting as a testable proposition. As consultants delve deeper into the problem, they continuously assess and refine their hypothesis based on emerging insights and evidence.

Through this iterative process, McKinsey teams unearth hidden patterns, pinpoint root causes, and develop more robust recommendations for their clients. By grounding decision-making in sound reasoning and data-driven insights, McKinsey ensures that their solutions are not only effective but also thoroughly vetted and validated.

Get Grounded in Evidence, Navigate Problems with Structure

'The McKinsey Mind' by Ethan Rasiel (ISBN 0071374299) The McKinsey Initial Hypothesis method emphasizes clarity, evidence, collaboration, flexibility, and continuous improvement in problem-solving endeavors—starting with an initial hypothesis can significantly benefit your approach to complex problems, catalyzing data collection and detailed examination. By rigorously validating or invalidating your initial hypothesis and adjusting it accordingly, you’ll gain a deeper understanding of the problem, along with a clearer grasp of associated risks and opportunities.

Be aware of the limitations of the initial hypothesis approach, though. It may be influenced by preconceived notions or existing solutions, limiting creativity and exploration. In such cases, adopt a more exploratory approach to fully uncover and address the complexities of the problem at hand, especially when innovative solutions and fresh perspectives are required.

Wondering what to read next?

  1. Intellectual Inspiration Often Lies in the Overlap of Disparate Ideas
  2. How to Solve a Problem By Standing It on Its Head
  3. Why Group Brainstorming Falls Short on Creativity and How to Improve It
  4. Creativity by Imitation: How to Steal Others’ Ideas and Innovate
  5. The Solution to a Problem Often Depends on How You State It

Keep Politics and Religion Out of the Office

By Leave a Comment

Keep Politics and Religion Out of the Office While workplaces often tout their commitment to diversity, there’s an unspoken expectation to assimilate into their prevailing culture and norms. They prefer a subtle balance of assertiveness, neither too outspoken nor too passive, and opinions that gravitate toward the middle ground. Even dress codes enforce this moderate approach, discouraging extremes of formality or informality.

But what if you’re not inclined toward conformity? What if your passions for politics or religion run deep, making it difficult to remain silent in professional settings?

Politics and religion strike at the core of personal identity for many individuals. They evoke strong emotions and convictions. Yet, discussing these subjects in the workplace can be fraught with peril, given their potential to divide.

You can navigate safely by aligning with politically correct viewpoints and avoiding controversial deviations. Occasionally, a mild comment may pass without incident, as long as it doesn’t offend sensibilities. However, remember that the workplace isn’t a platform for proselytizing personal beliefs. It’s crucial to respect boundaries and gracefully shift topics if conversations make others uncomfortable. Handle disagreements diplomatically, refraining from personal attacks. Also, be mindful that decorating your workspace with contentious symbols could alienate colleagues and disrupt harmony.

Idea for Impact: When it comes to hot-button topics like politics or religion, it’s best to keep those thoughts to yourself at work. Strong opinions can really rub people the wrong way and disrupt teamwork or create an uncomfortable atmosphere. Find other ways outside work to dive into what gets you fired up.

Wondering what to read next?

  1. The Sensitivity of Politics in Today’s Contentious Climate
  2. The More Facebook Friends You Have, The More Stressed You’ll Be
  3. Could Limiting Social Media Reduce Your Anxiety About Work?
  4. Can’t Ban Political Talk at Work
  5. Witty Comebacks and Smart Responses for Nosy People

There’s Real Danger in Religious Illiteracy

By Leave a Comment

There's Real Danger in Religious Illiteracy From Harvard’s Religious Literacy Project:

Understanding complex religious influences is a critical dimension of understanding modern human affairs. In spite of this awareness, there remains a widespread illiteracy about religion that spans the globe. There are many consequences of this illiteracy, but the most urgent is that it fuels conflict and antagonisms and hinders cooperative endeavors in all arenas of human experience.

In our multi-faith societies, it’s essential not only to understand our own faith traditions (or lack thereof) but also to grasp the traditions of others. Religion carries significant weight in many people’s lives, shaping individual and collective history, politics, and social dynamics through beliefs, practices, and traditions.

Unfortunately, widespread myths and factual inaccuracies about religious beliefs and texts often lead to misunderstandings and ignorance, fostering fear and prejudice.

Idea for Impact: Take the time to learn about different religions. It gives you a peek into people’s perspectives, values, and what drives them. Plus, it helps you recognize and deal with your own biases and stereotypes.

Wondering what to read next?

  1. Embracing Cultural Sensitivity: A Case Study of Akira Kurosawa’s Oscar Speech
  2. Labeling Damage
  3. Racism and Identity: The Lie of Labeling
  4. Could Limiting Social Media Reduce Your Anxiety About Work?
  5. The Problem of Living Inside Echo Chambers

The Dark Side of Selfies

By Leave a Comment

Selfies are generally acceptable to a certain extent. They provide a means to chronicle oneself and curate the highlights of one’s life, and as humans, we have an innate need to feel acknowledged and seen.

Selfies can be a tool for self-love and expression, allowing individuals to communicate something about themselves and present themselves in a certain way. When taken intentionally, a selfie can give the illusion of control over one’s fleeting identities, which is a natural desire. It’s perfectly fine to create a persona and seek others’ approval, as a healthy self-identity depends on it.

However, when taken too far, the desire to be liked and accepted can quickly become a constant need for validation and status. Self-objectification can cause one to forget that self-identity is primarily based on subjective, biased perceptions of others. Using selfies as the ultimate self-expression can lead to overinflated self-importance and shameless self-promotion.

Wondering what to read next?

  1. Could Limiting Social Media Reduce Your Anxiety About Work?
  2. No One Has a Monopoly on Truth
  3. To Know Is to Contradict: The Power of Nuanced Thinking
  4. Can’t Control What You Can’t
  5. I’ll Be Happy When …

Labeling Damage

By Leave a Comment

Labels not only stereotype individuals but also limit and stifle them. Even so-called positive labels like “little miss perfect” perpetuate harmful stereotypes and can be internalized. Labels create walls around people, making it difficult for them to break free from preconceived notions.

Instead of oversimplifying people’s traits and characteristics with labels, let’s celebrate individuality by avoiding labels altogether. Let’s embrace the complexity of each person and acknowledge their unique qualities.

Wondering what to read next?

  1. Racism and Identity: The Lie of Labeling
  2. There’s Real Danger in Religious Illiteracy
  3. Embracing Cultural Sensitivity: A Case Study of Akira Kurosawa’s Oscar Speech
  4. Stop Stigmatizing All Cultural ‘Appropriation’
  5. Beyond Mansplaining’s Veil

Beyond Mansplaining’s Veil

By Leave a Comment

“Mansplaining,” commonly associated with a condescending and chauvinistic attitude, traditionally refers to situations where men unnecessarily and patronizingly explain things to women, often silencing their voices.

However, the term “mansplaining” has been extensively used in recent years to the point where it sometimes carries connotations of “reverse sexism.” It’s often employed without carefully considering the validity of men’s opinions, resulting in the dismissal or belittlement of their arguments. It’s worth noting that both men and women can internalize sexist beliefs and attitudes due to societal conditioning.

While it’s true that many men exhibit patronizing and rude behavior, assuming that such mannerisms are exclusively a male trait is an oversimplification. Contempt can be seen across genders; it’s a flaw that goes beyond gender boundaries. Men interrupt and talk down to each other in debates. Some individuals, regardless of gender, treat everyone with the same interrupting and condescending tone—it’s simply their communication style. Therefore, the communication issue lies in “human-splaining,” and making generalizations solely based on gender is unfair and unproductive.

Furthermore, the term “mansplaining” is often carelessly used out of frustration and anger, becoming a convenient way to dismiss any man expressing an opinion or insisting on a viewpoint during a debate.

Idea for Impact: Let’s reserve the label for situations where it’s genuinely warranted and instead focus on addressing the underlying issue of unequal valuing of men’s and women’s words. Let’s examine entitlement and the impact of patriarchal structures. Engaging in productive dialogue is far more effective than resorting to gratuitous dismissals.

Wondering what to read next?

  1. Labeling Damage
  2. Racism and Identity: The Lie of Labeling
  3. Entitlement and Anger Go Together
  4. How Not to Handle a Bad Boss
  5. Can’t Ban Political Talk at Work